Suit Update

As a member of the Wisconsin Swim Coaches Association I just received this update on suits.

Suits, Suits, Suits…
Here is some information I am passing along from Tom Shafranski at the WIAA…

1) NFHS Swimming Suit Interpretations
There is a Speedo suit that has a clip, I think called poly clip, to tighten the straps on females suits.  At this time the clip is considered a fastening system and would not be legal under Rule 3-3-2b(4).

The Speedo FS Pro I that has some dimples or bumps on the chest area that were not permeable — this was a bit of an older model suit. If the bumps are removed, which they can be just picked off, the suit would be legal.  The FS Pro I is no longer being made this way.

2) This morning I received the note found below from the NFHS regarding school logos on swimming/diving suits.  The regulation has now been modified to allow school logos that use "sublimation" to place colors, designs, prints, etc. to be dyed into the fabric of a suit.  They are indicating the suit remains 100% permeable when the sublimation process is used to place a logo on a suit.  Consequently, these suits are legal.

NFHS Interpretation of Rule 3-3-2b, Logo Restrictions
The NFHS has received several questions regarding the application of Rule 3-3-2b(2), school logo restrictions, to swimsuits with logos and mascots applied to the suit during construction.

A process referred to as sublimation allows colors, designs, prints, etc. to be dyed into the fabric to be used for suits in a pre-construction phase.  This process has been present in the market for quite some time.  Using sublimation, colors or designs, such as a school mascot, are dyed into the fabric and the textile material remains 100% permeable.

The restriction of a single, post-construction, impermeable school name or logo, not to exceed 9 square inches, does not apply to suits using sublimation for the process to include a school mascot, name and/or logo on the suit.  The restriction applies only to the post-construction logos which render the material to no longer be 100% permeable.

SITUATION:  The referee observes the swimmers from Team A, the Eagles, during warm-ups wearing suits with an eagle on the front of the females’ suits larger than 9 square inches.  Likewise, the males’ jammers have an eagle on the side of the suit larger than 9 square inches.  The referee confirms with the coach of Team A that these mascots are dyed in the material and are not placed over the textile material of the suit impacting permeability. The referee allows the suits in competition as Rule 3-3-2b(2) does not apply to this suit.  RULING:  Correct procedure.  COMMENT: The restriction on the size and number of post-construction school logos is necessary to prevent covering the suit to make it impermeable.  The restrictions are not necessary when the sublimation process is used.

 

 

Advertisements

About kbedalov

Husband, Father, Coach, Friend. Just living life the way it was suppose to be: honorably, respectfully, and passionately. View all posts by kbedalov

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: